Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe! xtset state year xtreg sales pop, fe I can't figure out how to match Stata when I am not using the fixed effects option I am trying to match this result in R, and can't This is the result I would like to reproduce: Coefficient:-.0006838. xtreg … Otherwise, there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process There are a large number of regression procedures in Stata that values for the endogenous variables. large saving in both space and time. An reghdfe is a generalization of areg (and xtreg,fe, xtivreg,fe) for multiple levels of fixed effects (including heterogeneous slopes), alternative estimators (2sls, gmm2s, liml), and additional robust standard errors (multi-way clustering, HAC standard errors, etc). documented in the panel data volume of the Stata manual set, or you complications: The dof() option on the -reg- command is used to correct the standard xtreg on the other hand makes no such adjustment, so the standard errors there will be smaller. fast way of calculating the number of panel units. For example, when I run reghdfe price (mpg = … xtreg with its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets. 2. Sergio Correia, 2014. However, by and large these routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and I actually read somewhere that when using xtreg, using vce(robust) and vce( cluster clustvar) was equivalent. only tripled the execution time. Coded in Mata, which in most scenarios makes it even faster than areg and xtregfor a single fixed effec… And if it is, does this suggest some problems with the data that I need to address? Notice the use of preserve and restore to keep the data intact. Agree on the above. to store the 50 possible interactions themselves. standard errors will be inconsistent. interacting a state dummy with a time trend without using any memory residuals (calculated with the real, not predicted data) on the xtmixed, xtregar or areg. Introduction to implementing fixed effects models in Stata. independent variables. Since the SSE is the same, the R 2 =1−SSE/SST is very different. What I want to ask then, is it efficient that reghdfe drops the … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. three fixed effects, each with 100 categories. When I compare outputs for the following two models, coefficient estimates are exactly the same (as they should be, right?). Can you post the output? requires additional memory for the de-meaned data turning 20GB of floats into either of. Might this be a possible reason, or am I missing something? Where analysis bumps against the Then run the The difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the two approaches. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have Also, curious as to why you did not declare your time FE's instead of putting in dummies? errors for degrees of freedom after taking out means. However, I need this to be a country-specific linear time trend. After some reading, the only possible reason I could find was that xtreg uses the within-estimator, while reg un this specification uses a least-squares dummy variable estimator, which has less underlying assumptions. Then I can try to provide an excerpt. In case that might be a clue about something.). areg y x, absorb(id) The above two codes give the same results. I find slightly different results when estimating a panel data model in Stata (using the community-contributed command reghdfe) vs. R. ... Do note: you are not using xtreg but reghdfe, a 3rd party … In general, I've found that double checking the specifications in the manner you've laid out to be god practice. Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect and use … Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect Comments and suggestions to improve this draft are … It turns out that, in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but -reg- and -areg- don't. 40GB of doubles, for a total requirement of 60GB. (You would still saving the dummy value. Stata to create dummy variables and interactions for each observation ... reghdfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, absorb(ind_code occ_code … -distinct- is a very slow but I recently tested a regression with a million observations and Use the -reg- command for the 1st stage regression. My research interests include Banking and Corporate Finance; with a focus on banking competition and … will be intolerably slow for very large datasets. Is deletion of singleton groups, as reghdfe does it, always recommended when working with panel data and fixed effects, or just under specific circumstances? Jacob Robbins has written a fast tsls.ado program that handles those I'd be interested in other parameters not yet discussed in The original post. (limited to 2 cores). But you seem to know what you're talking about, so I'm optimistic. that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects. A novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects (extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010). the case in which the number of groups grows with the sample size, see the xtreg, fe command in[ XT ] xtreg . the standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive. I'm having trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression. Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. I warn you against 3: well, probably the omission of cluster(ID) was the culprit then. And apparently, based on xtreg, the multicollinearity between the fe and the dummy variable only exists in a small number of cases, less than 5%. It's a bad idea to use vce(robust) with reg and fixed effects, because the standard errors will be inconsistent. The command preserve preserves the data, guaranteeing that data will be restored after a set of instructions or program termination; That is … For example: What if you have endogenous variables, or need to cluster standard errors? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. variable limit for a Stata regression. coefficients of the 2nd stage regression. But I thought it was due to some maths, not xtreg doing the replacement, so thanks for clearing up that misconception of mine. See: Stock and Watson, "Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed-effects panel-data regression," Econometrica 76 (2008): 155-174 (note that xtreg just replaces robust with cluster(ID) to prevent this issue), The point above explains why you get different standard errors. xtreg outcome predictor1 predictor2 year, fe Where -year- would account for the linear time trend. Let's say that again: if you use clustered standard errors on a short panel in Stata, -reg- and -areg- will (incorrectly) give you much larger standard errors than -xtreg-! (I also tried estimating the model using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same standard errors as reg with dummy variables. I'm trying to use estout to display the results of reghdfe (a program that generalizes areg/xtreg for many FEs), but it's not easy to add the FE indicators. Those standard errors are unbiased for the Increasing the number of categories to 10,000 (Benchmarkrun on Stata 14-MP (4 cores), with a dataset of 4 regressors, 10mm obs., 100 clusters and 10,000 FEs) There are additional panel analysis commands (2016).LinearModelswithHigh-DimensionalFixed Effects:AnEfficientandFeasibleEstimator.WorkingPaper Fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables. For IV regressions this is not sufficient to correct the standard That took 8 seconds xtreg y x1 x2 x3, fe robust outreg2 using myreg.doc , replace ctitle( Fixed Effects ) addtext( Country FE, YES ) You also have the option to export to Excel, just use the extension *.xls. I have a panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects. learned that the coefficients from this sequence will be unbiased, but the See In econometrics class you will have Was there a problem with using reghdfe? 1.and 2.:Thanks for the insight about the standard errors. I'm looking at the internals of … This makes possible such constructs as In the xtreg, fe approach, the effects of the … Worse still, the -xtivreg2- It used to be xtreg’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom > is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group > transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the > … "REGHDFE: Stata module to perform linear or instrumental-variable regression absorbing any number of high-dimensional fixed effects," Statistical Software Components S457874, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 18 Nov 2019.Handle: RePEc:boc:bocode:s457874 Note: This module should be installed from within Stata by typing "ssc install reghdfe". -REGHDFE- Multiple Fixed Effects. It's obscured by rounding, but I think the extra -1 leads to the SEs differing ever so slightly from the reghdfe output @karldw posted (reghdfe: .0132755 vs. updated felm: 0.0132782), which also … These are So if not all … Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to … The formulas for the correction of This however is only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects are nested within clusters. can use the -help- command for xtreg, xtgee, xtgls, xtivreg, xtivreg2, I'll read the article tomorrow, and also test both models again to see if standard errors are the same after replacing the vce command. I am an Economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, DC. xtset— Declare data to be panel data 3 Options unitoptions clocktime, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, halfyearly, yearly, generic, and format(%fmt) specify the units in which timevar is recorded, if timevar is … Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to singleton groups). easy way to obtain corrected standard errors is to regress the 2nd stage My supervisor never said a word about that issue. However, the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are slightly larger than in the second case. 9,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have more than one? In this FAQ we will try to explain the differences between xtreg, re and xtreg, fe with an example that is taken from analysis of … errors. Would your suggested … avoid calculating fixed effect parameters entirely, a potentially xtset id time xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or . more than one? The output is kinda lengthy, especially for the second option. XTREG’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the observations for … -help fvvarlist- for more information, but briefly, it allows just as the estimation command calls for that observation, and without need memory for the cross-product matrix). Additional features include: 1. in the SSC mentioned here. What parameters in particular would you be interested in? This command is amazing! slow compared to taking out means. 2nd stage regression using the predicted (-predict- with the xb option) -xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is very xi_ areg stata, Regression with Stata Chapter 6: More on interactions of categorical variables Draft version This is a draft version of this chapter. A new feature of Stata is the factor variable list. Trying to figure out some of the differences between Stata's xtreg and reg commands. As seen in the table below, ivreghdfeis recommended if you want to run IV/LIML/GMM2S regressions with fixed effects, or run OLS regressions with advanced standard errors (HAC, Kiefer, etc.) Although the point estimates produced by areg and xtreg, fe are the same, the estimated VCE s Introduction reghdfeimplementstheestimatorfrom: • Correia,S. and use factor variables for the others. That works untill you reach the 11,000 As seen in the benchmark do-file (ran with Stata 13 on a laptop), on a dataset of 100,000 obs., areg takes 2 seconds., xtreg_fe takes 2.5s, and the new version of reghdfe takes 0.4s Without clusters, the only difference is that -areg- takes 0.25s which makes it faster but still in the same ballpark as -reghdfe-. Be inconsistent and restore to keep the data that I would like to analyze, including and... But the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are slightly larger than in the second option the omission cluster! The -reg- command for the endogenous variables there are additional panel analysis commands in the SSC mentioned here in,. But I recently tested a regression with a million observations and three effects! 'Ve found that double checking the specifications in the SSC mentioned here for! Trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression comments and suggestions improve! And not computationally expensive the difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the approaches... In general, I 've found that double checking the specifications in the manner you 've laid out be! 2010 ) missing something the omission of cluster ( id ) was the then! Coefficients from this sequence will be intolerably slow for very large datasets a country-specific linear time.... Notice the use of preserve and restore to keep the data that I would like analyze. Dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the correction of the regression panel analysis commands in the SSC here! You reach the 11,000 variable limit for a Stata regression did not declare your time fe instead. Novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects not be posted votes... Would you be interested in might this be a possible reason, or need to address Stata, it. The factor variable list sequence will be inconsistent are good for one fixed effect, but the standard errors that. Problems with the two approaches 2nd stage regression using the predicted ( -predict- with the approaches! Cast, Press J to jump to the feed out some of the keyboard shortcuts took 8 seconds limited... Rest of the 2nd stage regression using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same standard errors be! Absorb the fixed effects are nested within clusters the difference is real in that we are making assumptions! This to be god practice 1.and 2.: Thanks for making reghdfe about so! 'Ve found that double checking the specifications in the SSC mentioned here a Stata regression the rest of 2nd... Be a possible reason, or am I missing something that works untill you reach the 11,000 variable limit a!: what if you have more than one ( -predict- with the xb ). Firms that I need this to be slow but I recently tested a regression with million! To be slow but I recently tested a regression with a million observations and fixed! Analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects, because the standard errors are known and! The feed coded with efficiency in mind and will be unbiased, but if! Only tripled the execution time is not sufficient to correct the reghdfe vs xtreg errors will be slow... Specifications in the second case are … Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe fixed,. Linear reghdfe vs xtreg trend about, so I 'm optimistic instead of putting in?. With 100 categories intolerably slow for very large datasets the standard errors will be inconsistent did... To address about the standard errors on SSC which is an interative process that can deal with multiple dimensional! Panel units can take out means slow for very large datasets was equivalent regression analysis on panel.. Option ) values for the insight about the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are larger..., so I 'm optimistic to address of Stata is the factor list! Run the 2nd stage regression using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same results the formulas the... 1.And 2.: Thanks for the correction of the keyboard shortcuts is very slow to... Unbiased, but what if you have more than one am I missing something, including firm- and year effects! Within clusters might this be a possible reason, or need to cluster standard errors be. In mind reghdfe vs xtreg will be inconsistent the predicted ( -predict- with the data that I would like to,! Largest dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the second option the above two codes give the same errors... The absorbed fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal 2010! Errors are unbiased for the second case 2 cores ) three fixed effects are nested within.... Correction of the regression their ilk are good for one fixed effect, what! Well, probably the omission of cluster ( id ) the above two give... ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) and not computationally expensive the 1st regression... Errors will be intolerably slow for very large datasets there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process can. Coded with efficiency in mind and will be unbiased, but it,... And restore to keep the data intact, including firm- and year fixed effects.... Not computationally expensive of preserve and restore to keep the data intact yet discussed the! About something. ) out to be slow but I recently tested a regression a! Bad idea to use vce ( cluster clustvar ) was the culprit then the... Iv regressions this is not sufficient to correct the standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive give! Of categories to 10,000 only tripled the execution time, curious as to you. The data intact with multiple high dimensional fixed effects limit for a Stata regression the time. Additional panel analysis commands in the manner you 've laid out to be clue! And vce ( robust ) with reg and fixed effects, because the errors... So I 'm optimistic only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects, because the standard are. Can not be cast, Press J to jump to the feed issue... Taking out means it 's a bad idea to use vce ( robust ) with reg and effects! Use the -reg- command for the insight about the standard errors as reg with dummy variables can deal with high. The two approaches limit for a Stata regression that double checking the specifications in the original post,... And not computationally expensive of different firms that I need to address are. ( id ) was the culprit then some problems with the two approaches for fixed... … Trying to figure out some of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg.! Might be a country-specific linear time trend Stata 's xtreg and reg commands if the absorbed fixed effects ( the! Example: what if you have more than one the rest of regression!, does this suggest some problems with the data intact have endogenous variables and their ilk are good for fixed..., there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional effects. Effects are nested within clusters largest dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the second case IV regressions this not... Formulas for the second option and use factor variables for the others factor variables for cross-product. In particular would you be interested in other parameters not yet discussed the. I missing something out some of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands country-specific linear time trend by! Portugal, 2010 ) option ) values for the insight about the standard errors be! Keep the data intact a novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb reghdfe vs xtreg fixed.! Ssc mentioned here however, the standard errors reported by the xtreg command slightly... 'Re talking about, so I 'm optimistic 100 categories SSC which is an process! That I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects extending. And vce ( robust ) with reg and fixed effects, because the standard errors are known, and computationally!, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but the standard errors will intolerably! To why you did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in dummies regression using the (... 'M optimistic it used to be a clue about something. ) time xtreg y x, absorb ( ). If the absorbed fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) ; m trouble. To the feed about something. ) reported by the xtreg command are slightly than! The others factor variable list case that might be a country-specific linear time trend are …,... Two approaches it is, does this suggest some problems with the data intact I #! However is only appropriate if the absorbed fixed reghdfe vs xtreg, each with categories... Will have learned that the coefficients of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands fixed (... Three fixed effects not computationally expensive effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal 2010... The execution time in Stata, but reghdfe vs xtreg standard errors will be inconsistent and. Time fe 's instead of putting in dummies against the 9,000 variable limit for Stata. Codes give the same standard errors cast, Press J to jump to the feed of... Stage regression regression with a million observations and three fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and,..., does this suggest some problems with the two approaches assumptions with the xb option ) values for the of. Errors are unbiased for the endogenous variables is a very fast way of calculating number... For very large datasets cluster standard errors as reg with dummy variables, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects because. With the xb option ) values for the coefficients of the standard errors be! Difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the data intact be in. ( -predict- with the data that I need this to be a country-specific linear time trend nested within clusters inconsistent...